Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Brad Hightower's avatar

David E Fitch. I am reading your book and listening too. I will say this. I 100% agree with the distinction of the two powers and I believe this distinction is very helpful. I agree that when authors like Crouch and Langberg don't see this distinction, their analyses are very clumsy. Your two powers, as a tool to build an ecclesiology, is 100% helpful. An ecclesiology that protects leaders from wielding worldly power is far less prone to abuse. The language is helpful.

Expand full comment
Brad Hightower's avatar

I think you are making a dichotomy that separates worldly power (government) and godly power that is far too rigid. What I mean by this is secular institutions funded by the coercive power of the state (taxes) DON'T necessarily run on coercion and power. If everyone was holy and loving and good, I think we would still agree to systems exactly like we have requiring taxes and big collaborative efforts. For example, public education or the interstate highway system or traffic lights are means to the common good. Most of the good in the world is created by these human inventions / institutions. So to articulate two categories with humanity, sin, and secularism on one side and Christians, church, and relational healing on the other, I think, is not helpful and actually harmful.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts